| | | | |

When You Become Naked Inventory

Our feelings on being behind a paywall.

Naked Inventory. A couple is facing each other on a secluded beach at sunset. The is slowly lifting her dress up revealing her nude bum.

We have been asked many times to do interviews for vlogs and podcasts. Simple enoughโ€ฆ someone wanted to talk to us about our life in naturism. Weโ€™ve had these kind of conversations dozens of times. Usually on social media, at resorts, and at our local naturist park.

We have said no almost every time. There are a few reasons for this hesitation.

At first, we didnโ€™t have a clean argument behind it. It just felt like a no, or at least a not yet. It took a while to figure out why.

We write a lot about the line between nudity and sexuality. That being unclothed isnโ€™t inherently sexual, and that naturism is a practice, not a performance. We truly believe that so weโ€™ll keep writing about it. But our framework only holds true if the structure around the nudity matches the claim being made about it. And we don’t end up becoming someone’s naked inventory.

The First Hesitations

โ€‹It would be dishonest to not say the first hesitation is built on fear. After many years since having a tumor removed from my head and the treatments since, I have learned I don’t respond well to rapid-fire questions on the spot. I’m not as quick in thought as I used to be. And the fear of dead air or saying something I didn’t mean because I didn’t have time to ponder the right response is very real to me. I could never be a politician.

โ€‹There is also the fact that we are introverts, and our batteries run on a very specific charge. For us, an interview format that demands instant charisma and off-the-cuff verbal responses goes entirely against our natural tendencies. We prefer to process thoughts internally long before speaking, which means a live microphone can feel less like a conversation and more like an endurance test.

Drawing energy from quiet reflection means we lose it fast in prolonged, intense social interactions. For us, an interview requires a massive amount of “masking”โ€ฆ keeping up a hyper-vigilant level of energy, eye contact, and enthusiasm for an hour straight. By the time we are halfway through, the mental fatigue sets in, making it hard to stay sharp. It’s a big reason why we choose writing and photography and deliberately avoid video creation.

โ€‹When all eyes (or ears) are locked on us, every pause feels ten times longer than it actually is. That brief silence while we gather our thoughts doesn’t feel like a thoughtful reflection to our own nervous systems; it feels like an awkward void we are failing to fill.

โ€‹We aren’t necessarily afraid of the work. We just know our own limits, and we are exhausted by the theatrical audition and mental preparation required just to survive a format that doesn’t fit how we’re wired.

The Next Hesitations

Last year, we were asked to do an interview for a user on their Naturist Patreon account. When we looked them up, it seemed the account asking was performance-basedโ€ฆ built around escalating tiers of access, the kind where the โ€œfreeโ€ content is a censored preview or non existentโ€ฆ and the real material lives behind a paywall that gets more expensive as it gets more revealing. When we were approached, that structure hadnโ€™t been made explicit. It just existed, unstated, in the background of the request.

The Patreon page had Bronze, Silver, and Gold member pricing. Artistic, nonsexual, behind the scenes video, available in full to anyone paying the top rate. Monthly live calls with the creator. The language leaned hard on words like art, nonsexual, body freedomโ€ฆ the same vocabulary we use constantly, because itโ€™s true and it matters. But the structure underneath the words felt like it was doing something different than the words were saying. Their entire presence on social media was censored. So the only way to actually see them nude was to open your wallet and โ€œPay To See Moreโ€.

After looking at that account, we went looking at others out of curiosity. We found the same shape on page after page of naturist accountsโ€ฆ different names, same tiers, same words like โ€˜exclusiveโ€™ and โ€˜uncensoredโ€™ and โ€˜before anyone else.โ€™ This isnโ€™t one personโ€™s choice. Itโ€™s a template.

โ€‹We aren’t arguing about definitions of art or what counts as naturism. We also respect that charging more for higher production value, longer runtimes, or direct one-on-one time is completely reasonable. The contradiction specifically occurs when the primary commodity scaling up across tiers is nude human visibility. More money buys more skin, and more personal access.

If access to a piece of content increases specifically as a function of how much skin or how much intimacy it contains, the content is functioning as a commodityโ€ฆ regardless of what label is attached to it. Calling something โ€œnonsexual expressionโ€ doesnโ€™t change what the tier ladder is doing if the tier ladder is priced by exposure. The words and the incentive structure were pointing in opposite directions, and the structure wins, because structure is what people actually pay for.

After looking at these accounts, Corin said she doesn’t want to be someone’s for profit performance inventory.

โ€œEverything online is for-profit for someoneโ€

Itโ€™s tempting to wave off Corin’s words with a shrug. Everything online is monetized somehow. An Instagram creator sharing an interview clip profits tooโ€ฆ through engagement, audience growth, whatever comes next. Even our own website and Substack offer subscriptions and Ko-Fi donations if people choose to support us. So whatโ€™s actually different here?

The difference is between diffuse profit and direct profit. When someone shares your interview because itโ€™s interesting, youโ€™re one piece of content among many, and any benefit to them is general and downstream. When your interview sits inside a paid tier structure, you stop being shared content and start being inventoryโ€ฆ a line item positioned next to โ€œThe Secret Collectionโ€ and โ€œbehind the photosโ€ clips, priced the same way, sold the same way. The transaction isnโ€™t abstract anymore. Itโ€™s โ€œpay this much, get more of this.โ€

When your voice and likeness are locked behind someone else’s paywall, you lose control over who accesses your voice and images and what context it sits beside. That loss of agency is entirely foreign to how we chose to operate. Everything we publish, every article, every photograph, every thought we share on our website and Substack, is completely free, open, and accessible to anyone who wanders onto the page.

โ€‹When you put your work out into the open internet for free, you accept that people will read it, disagree with it, or share it in ways you can’t always control. But you still own the context. Your words live in a space you built, surrounded by the principles you laid out. We wrote a long time ago about our goals in Why We Are Naturism โ€œAdvocates!โ€

โ€‹Handing that same interview over to a tiered subscription model means surrendering that context entirely. Your voice becomes a marketing tool sitting directly beside content you didn’t create, for an audience you didn’t vet, packaged on a ladder where the ultimate incentive could turn into “pay more, see more.” You go from being a participant in a conversation to being part of someone else’s product catalog, and once that door is closed, you no longer have a say in who holds the key.

Thatโ€™s the part that was hard to name at first. Not profit itselfโ€ฆ profit is everywhere, and we donโ€™t begrudge anyone building a business. It was the specific mechanism of becoming a consumable: something whose value to the platform increases in proportion to how much of a person it reveals.

Why this matters beyond one interview

This isnโ€™t really about turning down one conversation. Itโ€™s about a pattern we think the naturist community should be able to name clearly, because the language of naturismโ€ฆ body acceptance, authenticity, nonsexual embodimentโ€ฆ is genuinely useful, and itโ€™s also borrowable. It can describe an honest practice, or it can dress up a paywall so that a support tier reads as artistic mission instead of what it functionally is: pay more, see more skin.

Both things can be true about the same account. Someone can believe, sincerely, that their movement pieces are nonsexual and still have built a pricing structure that behaves exactly like the thing naturism spends most of its energy trying to distinguish itself from. Intent doesnโ€™t fully control how structure reads. Weโ€™ve made that argument in this publication before, about our own mistakes. This was a chance to notice it in a request aimed at us.

We aren’t saying no to conversations entirely. We are saying โ€œmaybeโ€ to things that stay openโ€ฆ public articles, free podcasts, open discussions where anyone can walk up and listen without needing a subscription. The moment a conversation with us is boxed up and used to populate a tiered pricing ladder, it changes character. And it’s not the character we are choosing for our style of naturism.

In fact, we recently said yes.

โ€‹After some conversation with Evan from Planetnude about his New Nude Podcast, we agreed to an interview in the fall. Because his approach completely flips the script to the other requests. He offered questions in advance so our slow-thinking brains can actually process. He edits his own shows rather than demanding a high-wire live performance. Most importantly, he gave us final editorial review with the absolute right to kill the episode if it doesn’t feel right. And it isn’t behind a paywall.

โ€‹That isn’t inventory. Thatโ€™s just a conversation between people who care about the same philosophy, built on mutual respect and open access. It turns out we aren’t closed off to interviews at all. We just require the people inviting us into the room to remember that we are human beings sharing a story, not a product tier waiting to be unlocked.

After over six years in naturism, we are still newbs. We are still learning and growing ourselves so we donโ€™t know where this all will go. In the end, we said no to that first request and to many others so far, or at least not like that.

It isn’t because interviews are dangerous, or because Patreon is bad, or because anyone involved is acting in bad faith. We just feel thereโ€™s a real difference between being asked to share a story and being asked to become part of a product lineโ€ฆ and once you feel that difference, itโ€™s hard to unfeel it.

Kevin & Corin

Ournaturistlife.com


If youโ€™d like to support what we do, you can choose a monthly supporter subscription or a one time donation through Ko-fi. Everything we write and post is always free, but this helps fuel our late-night naked potato-salad-fuelled rants!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Posts

9 Comments

  1. Thank you for sharing this. I appreciate your thoughts. I commend you on your stance which I think is a correct position…

    Luther

  2. This is why I love your content. You all are so real and genuine! I wonโ€™t pay for sites because you can surf the web all you want for free. I stumble across nudist sites and then they will disappear. Then they will appear briefly and say you can see me on Patreon or only fans but you have to pay! You guys have stayed the course and you respond to the comments to and I appreciate that. Love your posts!!

  3. When content becomes your paycheck, it could very easily lead down a path that will tantalize to increase the monetary return. I applaud you both for staying true to your principles. Thank you.

  4. Thank you for saying something I’ve felt in my subconscious for a while, probably a few years. Like you, I don’t begrudge anyone making money from online content. But like you, I’m trying to build a body of knowledge about the way of naturism apart from erotic content. (There’s need for clear talk about that too, but separately from naturist spaces.) The “pay to Seymour” approach goes against these attenpts.

  5. I love Evanโ€™s podcast (like I love your blog!), and I look forward to hopefully hearing your interview.

  6. I personally don’t subscribe to any patreon or pay for accounts. Nor do I listen or watch any podcasts / vlogs, don’t like them, too much waffle for me. I do buy you a coffee every month though.
    Keep doing what you’re doing.

  7. We, Linda and I, prefer the smaller gatherings, too, primarily because we retain control, and are not displayed to the world. Nudistry is best among friends!
    If we wanted to share our story to the world, we would, but we prefer the friendships of real friends.
    Verygary

  8. Totally agree with you on paywall. Especially from a mental health point of view. As an autistic person engaging with other people is a major deal for me and I tend to avoid doing so. To put yourself through that while also being naked and dealing with your brain issues is a level of stress you do not need.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *